If IVGID’s General Manager committed or directed the commission of a crime such as concealment of public records (felony), making a false or misleading public statement (gross misdemeanor) or unauthorized expenditure of public money (misdemeanor), what do you think would be the most appropriate response by the IVGID Board of Trustees?

If IVGID’s District Counsel law firm committed or assisted in the commission of a crime such as concealment of public records (felony), making a false or misleading public statement (gross misdemeanor) or unauthorized expenditure of public money (misdemeanor) what do you think would be the most appropriate response by the IVGID Board of Trustees?

In early August, the IVGID Board of Trustees first discovered that IVGID’s GM Pinkerton, District Counsel Guinasso and other staff were collaborating to conceal and/or destroy public email records. The GM and District Counsel have since been implicated by citizens in over a dozen counts of concealing public records plus other alleged criminal misconduct.

In September, the IVGID Board voted 3 FOR (Wong, Horan, Morris) to 2 AGAINST (Dent, Callicrate) to give the GM a $29,675 annual increase in compensation, just 5 months after negotiating a new 3 year contract. At the upcoming Board meeting on Wednesday, November 15 at 6pm, the IVGID Board has agendized a new contract offer to District Counsel Guinasso.

Prior to reading this, what describes your knowledge of the IVGID public records scandal and subsequent board actions?

Any other comments or suggestions about the IVGID public records scandal?