When it comes to local growth in College Station and the new roads and new water/sewer pipes that enable building new homes and other new buildings, which best describes who you think should pay to build those new roads and pipes? (Choose ONE)

For major public projects that will serve the community for many years, such as improvements to roads, water, sewer, recreation, and other long-lived facilities, which best describes how you think the City should generally pay for them? (Choose ONE)

Local governments in Texas are not allowed to do any political advocacy for candidates, or for or against ballot measures in their jurisdiction. They can only provide information. This keeps public money and staff from being used for partisan purposes. But local governments in Texas are allowed to use public money and staff time to advocate and provide information (“to lobby”) state or federal officials regarding issues or projects affecting their communities.

Which ONE do you think makes the most sense when it comes to local governments using public money to lobby state or federal officials?

When considering local housing policy, which of the following should the City prioritize, if any? (You can choose up to THREE, if any)

Any other comments or suggestions about growth funding, City projects, City advocacy, or local housing?